#The art of deduction amazon drivers#

ScottвЂ™s lawsuit also says shifts were вЂњchronically understaffed,вЂќ which left some employees unable to take short 10-minute rest breaks in order to finish their work on time. Lines would form at the computer system where employees swiped their badges to clock out for their break time, meaning those at the end of the line saw their breaks shortened as they waited their turn.

#The art of deduction amazon drivers#

The state investigation in that case found that Green Messengers, the subcontractor for Amazon, underpaid drivers, scheduling them 10-hour days but with a workload that forced drivers to skip meal and rest breaks.Дue to the way the meal breaks were organized in Vacaville, Scott claims, many workers took their breaks at the same time. The Supreme Court decided in 2014 that Amazon workers at a Nevada warehouse werenвЂ™t entitled to pay for the time they spent waiting to have their bags searched after clocking out but before leaving the building.Д®arlier this month in a separate case, Amazon and an independent contractor it worked with in California were fined $6.4 million for wage theft by the California Labor CommissionвЂ™s Office. The matter of paying workers for time they spend waiting for employers while off the clock has come up in other cases as well. When they did get their meal breaks, workers were expected to monitor their walkie-talkies in case of any problems on the floor, which sometimes cut into their break time, the suit claims. Lovenia Scott, a former employee of the Vacaville, California warehouse, alleges that the company didnвЂ™t schedule the required 30-minute meal breaks for workers.

First filed in San Francisco County Superior Court in February, the case was removed to US District Court California, Northern District on Friday. A lawsuit that claims one of AmazonвЂ™s fulfillment centers in California failed to provide required meal breaks for employees has moved to federal court, as attorneys seek class-action status.